About Hitwise

Hitwise is the leader in online competitive intelligence. Contact Hitwise to maximize your online marketing programs.
Subscribe to RSS Feed via Feedburner Subscribe to Email Feed Subscribe to Twitter Feed

Hitwise Intelligence - Sandra Hanchard - Asia Pacific

Analyst Weblog

« Airline Wars - Qantas and Virgin Blue battle it out online | Rise of Online Music Retail - Singapore »

'Mohammed Cartoons' - Public turns to Citizen Media

February 09, 2006

The political furore over the publication of 12 cartoons linking the Islam prophet, Muhammad to terrorism in the Danish newspaper, Jyllands-Posten, prompted Internet users worldwide to seek out the images for their own viewing. Several Australian newspapers, including The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald and West Australian however reserved the decision not to publish the offending cartoons, in light of the recent Cronulla race riot tensions. Users then went online for other sources that would.

Hitwise data shows that searches for 'mohammed cartoons', 'muslim cartoons', 'muhammad cartoons' and 'danish cartoons' (search variations listed in order of popularity) spiked dramatically week ending February 4, 2006. The blog of political commentator, Tim Blair (www.timblair.net) overtook the blogs of The Age and Sydney Morning Herald on February 6, 2006 after he published the cartoons on February 5. Interestingly, timblair.net received website traffic on the search term, 'blasphemy'.

While the Australian Government had issued warnings to the mainstream media to exercise editorial responsibility, the Internet has complicated the balance between free speech and protection of religious sensitivities.

The control of information flow through Citizen Media becomes near impossible, where the spread of unsanctioned editorial has the potential to inflame population tensions, now on a global level, as we've witnessed with these cartoons.

mohammedcartoons.png

timblair.png


Posted by Sandra Hanchard at 10:59 AM | (2) | (0)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL:
http://weblogs.hitwise.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/135.

Comments

There is no 'balance between free speech and protection of religious sensitivities'. Either there's free speech, or there is none. Free, by definition, means free.

Posted by Chris Zaharias | February 11, 2006 11:41 AM

Thanks for your comment, Chris. I'd like to refer to a recent quote by former Australian prime minister, Malcolm Fraser, in The Age:

"Freedom of speech has never meant the right to say anything, no matter how offensive to some other race, group or religion ... I believe they (the cartoons) have to be put in the total context of the war on terror. Very few things are absolute and freedom of expression is not absolute.

We should be trying to make it harder for extremists to recruit, but we are making it easier by "doing things that are stupid", he says.

Posted by Sandra Hanchard | February 11, 2006 07:56 PM

Post a comment

If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry.

 
Image of Sandra Hanchard

Sandra Hanchard

Senior Analyst, Hitwise Asia Pacific.

Archives (view all posts)

Categories