About Hitwise

Hitwise is the leader in online competitive intelligence. Contact Hitwise to maximize your online marketing programs.
Subscribe to RSS Feed via Feedburner Subscribe to Email Feed Subscribe to Twitter Feed

Hitwise Intelligence - Robin Goad - UK

Analyst Weblog

« Apprenticeships and The Apprentice | Mobile phones are the most searched for consumer electronics product; Apple the top brand »

Twitter and UK newspaper websites

March 16, 2009

Last week (w/e 14/03/09) Twitter.com was the 54th most visited website in the UK, up from 66th the week before. One consequence of Twitter rapid rise up the rankings is that the micro-blogging service has now overtaken most of the UK newspapers online. As the chart below illustrates, last week Twitter received more UK Internet visits than the homepages of the Guardian, Times, Sun and Telegraph. It also over took Google News UK. Of the main newspaper homepages, only the Daily Mail received more UK Internet visits than Twitter last week.

UK_Internet_traffic_to_Twitter_Google_news_newspaper_websites_2009_chart.png

There are few caveats here, the first relating to how we categorize newspaper websites within Hitwise. Wherever possible we split out topic specific domains for the newspapers, particularly the broadsheets (e.g. Times Online - Business, Telegraph Sport, Technology Guardian, etc.). Consequently the traffic illustrated in the chart above refers only to the newspapers’ main homepages; although in every case these do receive the majority each title’s visits.

However, it is also important to point out that we are only measuring traffic to the Twitter homepage and not hits via third party applications such as Tweetdeck or Twitterrific. Given that some people claim that these exceed the direct hits via the website, it is also fair to say that actual Twitter usage is higher than our numbers imply. Therefore, even taking all of these caveats into accounts, the trend is clear: in the UK, Twitter now receives more UK Internet traffic than most of the main newspaper websites and is growing at a faster rate.

Although Twitter is a news source for many, it is also a source of traffic for news websites. During February, 9.6% of Twitter’s downstream traffic went to News and Media websites, and 41% of that went to the News and Media – Print sub-category, which is dominated by the newspaper sites. The chart below illustrates the top News and Media – Print websites to receive traffic from Twitter over the last year. As you can see, the Guardian currently receives more traffic than any of its competitors. And not only is its homepage the top recipient of Twitter traffic, but three of its sections (Technology, Comment is Free, and Media) also appear in the top 10.

UK_Internet_traffic_from _twitter_to_the_Guardian_daily_mail_telegraph_sun_new_york_times_2008_2009_chart.png

So, Twitter is becoming a significant source of traffic for news sites, but how does it fare when compared with other news aggregator websites? As in the US, Twitter has already overtaken Digg in the UK and, as the chart below illustrates, is now a bigger source of traffic for News and Media – Print websites. However, despite having overtaken Google News UK in terms of Internet visits, Twitter still sends only a sixth as much traffic to Print websites. Twitter is also a smaller source of traffic than News Now, while Facebook sends over ten times as many visits to the category.

Online_newspaper_traffic_from_facebook_twitter_news_now_digg_UK_2009_2008_chart.png

Follow Hitwise UK on Twitter.

Posted by Robin Goad at 12:00 PM | (2) | (2)
In Categories Blogs | News and Media | Social networks | Twitter

TrackBack

TrackBack URL:
http://weblogs.hitwise.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/1150.

Links to weblogs that reference this entry:

Comments

This is great data, seems like news sites will have to get more active in the microblogging game to stay ahead!

Just wanted to point out a couple of things:

# A related post from @dannysullivan, shows that twitter web only accounts for ~30% of twitter's usage (again by visits or maybe hits?).


# Twitter would have a much higher visit/ub ratio than the news sites due to the very addictive nature of microblogging platforms. Not sure if measurement by visits gives the complete picture?

Note that Google trends within it's own limitations shows 'twitter web traffic' is still way behind that of all the sites compared above:
http://trends.google.com/websites?q=guardian.co.uk%2C+timesonline.co.uk%2C+dailymail.co.uk%2C+twitter.com&geo=GB&date=all&sort=0

Posted by Nikhil Jain (@nikhiljn) | April 8, 2009 12:52 AM

Thanks for the comment, Nikhil.

Good point about Twitter and the 3rd party apps, etc... I agree that we under-measure Twitter by only looking at the Twitter.com website, which is why I'm always careful to include the caveats. We've just put out some more recent Twitter stats and found that Twitter.com was the 50th most visited website last week. Going by the assumption that Twitter gets twice as much traffic again from 3rd party apps, that would make Twitter around the 20th most popular site in the UK - still slightly smaller than MySpace, and quite a bit smaller than Facebook.

http://weblogs.hitwise.com/robin-goad/2009/04/what_would_a_google_twitter_marriage_mean.html

Regarding the Google Trends chart, again the caveats are important: Google is measuring all traffic to, say, guardian.com, whereas wherever possible we split our traffic to sub domains such as Guardian Football, Media Guardian, etc... In the case of the Guardian, around half of traffic to their site goes to these sub domains. So, if these visits were all added together, our data would probably show that the total of each of the main newspapers propeties would be bigger than Twitter.com.

Finally, with regards to visits vs. UVs - obviously these are different measures that provide different types of insight. The reason we use visits as our primary metric is precisely because it does include 'engagement' - i.e. sites with less UVs but more frequent and loyal visitors are 'rewarded' with a higher visits number. Typically there is also a correlation between visits and page views, which in the media landscape is important for advertsing, etc.

Robin

Posted by Robin Goad | April 8, 2009 01:39 PM

Post a comment

If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry.

 
Image of Robin Goad

Robin Goad

Research Director, Hitwise UK.

Archives (view all posts)

Categories