About Hitwise

Hitwise is the leader in online competitive intelligence. Contact Hitwise to maximize your online marketing programs.
Subscribe to RSS Feed via Feedburner Subscribe to Email Feed Subscribe to Twitter Feed

Hitwise Intelligence - Robin Goad - UK

Analyst Weblog

« Credit crunch dominates fast moving search terms | Impact of the T-mobile G1 (google phone) launch »

Top Ski Resorts

September 24, 2008

UK Internet searches for ski holidays started to take off at the start of September and, if historical activity is anything to go by, they will continue increasing until Christmas, before gradually declining into virtual hibernation by April.

Ski Holidays.png

One of the trends that we have noticed in the ski market over the last couple of years is the increase in searches for specific resorts. To monitor this behaviour we created a search term portfolio containing the names of nearly 400 resorts around the world. As you can see from the chart below, UK Internet searches for this portfolio of terms almost doubled between the 06/07 and the 07/08 seasons.

Global Ski Resorts.png

If you wanted to know which are currently the most popular, here is a list of the 10 most searched for resorts for the 4 weeks ending 13/09/08:

1. Chamonix
2. Alta
3. Whistler
4. Morzine
5. Blue Mountain
6. Banff
7. Zermatt
8. Glencoe
9. Les Gets
10. Val Thorens


Follow Hitwise UK on Twitter.

Posted by Robin Goad at 10:21 AM | (3) | (0)
In Categories Search | Sport | Travel

TrackBack

TrackBack URL:
http://weblogs.hitwise.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/978.

Comments

Surprised to see Alta so high in the list. Possibly people searching for "Alta Vista" or other non-ski terms?

Les Gets also surprisingly high. I'd have thought some of the glacial resorts might feature higher at this time of year, with Zermatt the only resort with a glaciar in the list I think.

Posted by Adam C | September 24, 2008 11:18 AM

Interesting info for the ski season!

Re: your list of the 10 most searched for resorts - I'm assuming the date range you're referring to is actually 13/09/08, not 13/09/07 as reported?

Posted by Paul | September 24, 2008 11:39 PM

Hi Paul, Yes the date should read 13/09/08. This has now been updated.
Thanks,
Hitwise

Posted by Eva | September 26, 2008 04:11 PM

Post a comment

If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry.

 
Image of Robin Goad

Robin Goad

Research Director, Hitwise UK.

Archives (view all posts)

Categories