Analyst Weblog
« Google Book Search on the rise | Apple iPhone UK price drop »
A couple of months ago we highlighted the fate of GoCompare, the insurance comparison site that was ‘blacklisted’ by Google after the search engine discovered irregular linking activity. Just to recap: for the first few weeks of 2008, ‘car insurance’ was sending more traffic to www.gocompare.com than any other search term, including its own brand name. But once the penalty was applied, the site plummeted down the rankings for ‘car insurance’ and other key terms, leaving competitors such as Confused.com and Comparethemarket.com to pick up the pieces.
So how is the recovery going? The chart below illustrates how much search traffic GoCompare receives from ‘car insurance’. The orange line represents its share of traffic from the term since Christmas, while the blue line represents its rank amongst all of the sites receiving traffic from the term over the same period. As you can see, for the first few weeks of the year GoCompare ranked second for ‘car insurance’ (behind Money Supermarket), and at its peak was receiving over 15% of traffic from term (4 weeks ending 25th January 2008).

However, once the site fell down Google’s listings, its rank dropped to a low of 9th for the term ‘car insurance’, receiving less than 2% of traffic from the term for the 4 weeks ending 1st March 2008. Since then it has started the slow climb back up the rankings, receiving 3.75% of traffic for the term for the latest 4 weeks, moving up to 7th place. In other words: 11 weeks since the penalty first took effect, and GoCompare still has a long way to go.
It is interesting to consider what the financial costs of such a ‘blacklisting’ might be. Obviously the biggest cost is the lost business as a result of falling search traffic to GoCompare’s website, but it would have also incurred increased marketing costs in order to aid its recovery. One of these is an increase in paid search activity, as illustrated in the chart below.

The orange line is same as in the first chart, while the pink line represents the proportion GoCompare’s search traffic from the term ‘car insurance’ that came from paid listings. As you can see, when the site was riding high before the ‘blacklisting’, it was well optimized and didn’t rely heavily on paid search for traffic from the term ‘car insurance’; but this situation changed once its organic ranking slipped. GoCompare’s paid search activity for the term shot up and, although this is now declining as the site’s organic ranking recovers, it is still well above the pre-‘blacklisting’ levels.
Tweet
Posted by Robin Goad at 10:00 AM
|
(9)
|
(0)
In Categories Financial Services | Google | Search
Great follow up post, its interesting to see the effect of the penalty. I wonder how long it will take them to get higher in the search ranking and whether they can ever achieve this again. Look forward to seeing their progress in another few months.
Posted by Pete White | April 17, 2008 10:16 AM
We seemed to have been blacklisted in early December. To this day, I don't know what we had done to get penalised so much. Our pagerank fell and we disappeared from top position to nowhere. We hadn't changed any HTML code, ISP or done any irregular marketing (we do our own marketing). We're only just starting to recover now, which is 4 months on. It is very frustrating being so reliant on a single search engine for most of our online business.
Posted by Elliot Bull | April 19, 2008 06:10 PM
It's quite informative and useful. The tables alone shows impressive reports about the subject matter.
Posted by jetcetera | April 21, 2008 09:27 AM
Sorry, but unclear exactly what GoCompare have done here - they paid for blogs to have links to them - si that it? How do Google know and if they don;t clarify how are brands meant to avoid doing it?
Posted by blujez | April 25, 2008 01:02 PM
Hi bluejez - thanks for the comment.
Google doesn't comment on individual 'blacklisting' cases, but there is a quite a lot of comment on what they may or may not have done here:
http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/gocompare-suffers-big-google-penalty/
Regards, Robin
Posted by Robin Goad | April 28, 2008 09:12 AM
Hi Robin
Isn't the page rank line on the first graph incorrect, i believe it show show falling page rank rather than increasing unless of course the scale is the wrong way around?
Posted by Garry Davis | September 23, 2009 12:00 PM
Well Google just kicked goCompare.com out and it's nasty for them. Well they didn't take the SEO thing carefully. Irregular link building was the key point.. Well but i have seen cases in which sites make a massive comeback..!
Posted by Shubham | February 12, 2010 01:27 PM
GoCompare should count itself lucky that it gets any traffic from the term. Can you guys see any patterns in the referring site traffic that suggests they are getting better inbound links?
Posted by Local SEO Guide | April 16, 2008 06:27 PM