September 20, 2006

YouTube Takes 2 in 3 UK Visits to Video Sharing

This week's announcement that Warner Music would make some music videos available on YouTube in return for a cut in ad revenue signals a recognition by at least one record company that advertising supported content has potential to be a lucrative business model online. This coupled with MSN's entry to video sharing, via Soapbox on MSN Video prompted us to publish some updated stats on video sharing in the UK.

Hitwise data shows that Market share of UK internet visits to the top 10 video sharing websites has increased 13-fold since the start of the year and has doubled in the past three months. YouTube is the dominant video sharing site, capturing 1 in every 400 UK internet visits and 2 in 3 of visits to the top 10 video sharing sites (week to 16th September 2006).

Visitors spent an average of 17 minutes and 32 seconds on YouTube last week and the site captured more than twice as large a share of UK visits than Google Video, the second ranked video sharing site, with 23% market share (combined UK and .com domains).
top 10 video sharing.png

YouTube visits are 8 minutes longer than average for all categories of websites. Coupled with the site's popularity, the site is a potentially lucrative platform for advertising.

MSN UK Video accounted for 1.71% of UK internet visits among the top 10 video sharing sites last week. The site received 63% of its traffic from MSN UK's portal page (www.msn.co.uk) and 11 of the top 20 sites sending visits to MSN UK Video last week were MSN properties, accounting for 83% of the site's upstream visits. Perhaps due to the site's past focus on slick, professional content, MSN Video has in the past appealed more to an older demographic, with 63% more UK visits from the 55+ age group than YouTube.

Posted by Heather Hopkins at 05:00 PM
Posted to Video Sharing

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://weblogs.hitwise.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/323.

Comments

It could be because MSN is the default home page for Internet Explorer and "older" less-technically savvy people aren't aware of how to change this page (or use an alternative browser), so hence more older people have MSN as their home page. So, does MSN's home page have a similar demographic as the video page?

Posted by: Ed at September 20, 2006 07:07 AM

Ed, Interesting question. I looked at Hitwise data and found that in the past four weeks, MSN UK's portal homepage in fact skews slightly toward a younger audience, over-indexing relative to the online population among 18-25 year olds (by 15%) and under-indexing among silver surfers (55+ age group) by 11%.

So it would seem that the 55+ age group is more likely to visit the MSN UK Video site after MSN UK than younger visitors.

I welcome other comments/feedback on this.

Posted by: Heather Hopkins at September 20, 2006 11:40 AM

Thats interesting. Perhaps its because the "silver surfers" are less aware of whats "out there", so are less likely to type www.youtube.com in their address bar and are more likely to explore the portal they're given as their home page.

I know Rupert Murdoch has said that he believes (I'm not sure if hes remotely qualified) that portals are not the way his users want things - they know the sites they like. (Source: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/09/20/murdoch_portals_myspace_china/)

I guess hes talking about younger users as thats very much the target of MySpace, so this could explain that.

Younger users are also more likely to be discussing websites with their friends than older users - I can't see my parents going to a party and discussing MSN Videos. At the same time, sites like YouTube and Google Video allow linking of videos into blogs etc - I'm sure that these have a demographic skewed towards younger users. Obviously these videos are watermarked and provide advertising for the sites.

I've never heard anyone discussing MSN appart from as in MSN Messenger. In fact I bet many people aren't even aware that there is anything else to MSN appart from the Messenger! In the US it appears to be a different story though, with AIM being more popular than the UK.

Out of interest, can you tell how many people start their browsing (i.e. have their home page) at msn.co.uk? I'm not sure how you gather these stats, but anyone with a default IE home page will have it set to http://www.microsoft.com/isapi/redir.dll?prd=ie&pver=6&ar=msnhome which will redirect to msn.co.uk... I bet theres a skewed demographic involved there.

Posted by: Ed at September 20, 2006 03:37 PM

Ed, Thanks for the follow up. You might be interested in these statistics I pulled this morning when looking into this further. I pulled off the top 5 categories visited by the 55+ age group based on volume of visits and concentration of visits.

By volume, silver surfers are most likely to visit: Computers & Internet, Search Engines, Adult
Shopping and Classifieds and Business and Finance. I compared this to the categories visited by 18-24 year olds and there were two differences - Adult was further down the list for silver surfers (ranking 2nd among 18-24 year olds) and Business and Finance was replaced by Entertainment (which includes gaming sites).

The top categories based on percentage of visitors from silver surfers were: Travel - Cruises, Lifestyle - Family, Business & Finance - Stocks and Shares, Business & Finance - Utilities and News and Media - Weather. Each of these receive more than one quarter of their visits from silver surfers.

The top sites based on volume of visitors from silver surfers in the past four weeks were Google UK, MSN Hotmail, Orange, Ebay UK, and Google. For 18-24 year olds it was Google UK, eBay UK, MSN UK and MySpace.

I find it really interesting that MSN UK ranks ahead of MySpace in the volume of visits from 18-24 year olds. The reason for this is volume. MSN UK received more than twice the share of UK internet vists last week, as compared with MySpace. MySpace received 34% of its visits from 18-24 year olds compared with 20% for MSN UK. Because MSN UK is a higher volume site, it received a higher volume of visits from 18-24 year olds.

Also, the UK portals for Yahoo! and MSN both skew slightly young, both over-representing with the 18-24 year olds and under-representing with silver surfers.

As for your other question - in our syndicated service we report on the main URL and aggregate visits up to that main URL (i.e. uk.msn.com). In bespoke reporting we can isolate specific sections of a site and in some cases specific URLs. As you might expect, there is a fee for this. Please do let us know if you'd like to explore this further.

Posted by: Heather Hopkins at September 21, 2006 12:12 AM

Interesting to note the difference in time spent per visit for Google.com and Google.co.uk was so large. I wonder if this is because the .co.uk version is giving more tailored UK orientated material.

Posted by: Phil Bradley at September 29, 2006 01:25 AM

This is really interesting. How has this changed over time? Is there a lot of churn in the popularity of sites?

Posted by: Tom at October 4, 2006 04:36 AM

Tom, YouTube overtook Google Videos in the UK in February and has been climbing ever since in market share of visits. In March 2006, You Tube had just less than double the market share of UK visits compared with Google Video. In September, that gap had risen to 4x.

Posted by: Heather Hopkins at October 5, 2006 03:02 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)